Legal Opinion
Bercy Industries, Inc. v. Mechanical Mirror Works, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 2, 1967No. 67 Civ. 3420PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYAN, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Bercy Industries, Inc. (Bercy), sues for infringement of a design patent on a portable illuminable mirror, unfair competition with respect to this product, and misleading designation of origin in violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and damages. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S. C. § 1338(a) and (b). Plaintiff moves, for a preliminary injunction against alleged continued infringement, unfair competition and Lanham Act violation.
Plaintiff is the manufacturer of an illuminable portable travel…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Flexitized, Inc., and Flexitized Sales Corporation v. National Flexitized Corporation and Dubin-Haskell Lining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Blisscraft of Hollywood v. United Plastics Company, Marmax Products Corp., and Morris Shapiro, Doing Business as Great Eastern Housewares CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Remco Industries, Inc. v. Toyomenka, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Eastern Electric, Inc. v. Seeburg CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Trimble Products Inc. v. W. T. Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Water Gremlin Company v. Ideal Fishing Float Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1975
- Ames Shower Curtain Co. v. Heinz Nathanson, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.