Legal Opinion

J. A. & W. A. Hess, Inc. v. Hazle Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1976No. Appeal, No. 31 T.D. 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

In tbe case now before ns, onr Supreme Court has remanded the appeal of J. A. & W. A. Hess, Inc. (Hess) to us for a determination of three specific issues not addressed in our initial opinion in this matter, J. A. & W. A. Hess, Inc. v. Hazle Township, 9 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 409, 305 A.2d 404 (1973).

Specifically, we have been asked to decide the following:

1. Whether Hess can properly assert a quasi-contractual (quantum meruit) recovery against Hazle Township (Township) in light of its delivery to Township of quantities of gravel in excess of a stated contractual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hudock v. Donegal Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Long v. Lemoyne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Chester School District's AuditSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Ruth-Hastings Glass Tube Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J. A. & W. A. Hess, Inc. v. Hazle TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Tuxedo Cheverly Volunteer Fire Co. v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Baltimore City Department of Recreation & ParksCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API