Keene v. Reed
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Justice.
Appellants, as owners of lots in an addition, use of which was restricted by contract to single family dwellings, sought an injunction restraining the operation of beauty parlors by appellees.
The court found under undisputed evidence that appellees have operated their beauty parlors continuously since April, 1953; that appellees Reed had remodeled their home for use as a beauty shop over six years previous to the filing of suit at a cost of $2,000, and had purchased $1,500 worth of equipment therefor; that the violations of restrictions by appellees had been open and obvious…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Culver v. PickensTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- McLaughlin v. NeigerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Arrington v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dempsey v. Apache Shores Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- El Paso Development Co. v. Berryman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Schoenhals v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Garden Oaks Board of Trustees v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Park v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.