Legal Opinion

Midland Elevator Co. v. Robey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 18, 1914No. 3773PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Action by the Midland Elevator Company against R. E. Ro-bey for balance due on a promissory note. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This was an action for an alleged balance due upon a promissory note, the trial resulting in a judgment for defendant, and from such judgment the plaintiff appeals.

The facts and propositions of law in this case are identical with those in Midland Elevator Co. v. Harrah, ante, 143 Pac. 1168, and Midland Elevator Co. v. Harrah- Robb Grain Co., ante, 143 Pac. 1168, and by stipulation of the parties the three causes are consolidated, the opinion in this cause to be the same as the opinion in Midland Elevator Co. v. Harrah, supra.

Eor the reasons given in the decision in that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Midland Elevator Co. v. HarrahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Midland Elevator Co. v. Harrah-Robb Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis S.F.R. Co. v. MettsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Durant Nat. Bank v. CumminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API