Legal Opinion

St. Louis S.F.R. Co. v. Metts

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1915No. 4469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from County Court, Choctaw County; W. T. Glenn, Judge. Action by J. W. Metts against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WATTS, C.

This action was begun before-a justice of the peace of Choctaw county by plaintiff in error against the defendant in error, and resulted in judgment for defendant in error. The case was appealed to the county court, and tried to the court and jury on April 23, 1912, with the same results. The plaintiff-in error filed a motion for new trial, which was denied. Judgment was rendered for defendant in error, from which plaintiff in error appeals, assigning as error the following:

“I. The court erred in overruling defendant’s objection to the introduction of any evidence.
“II. In overruling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Midland Elevator Co. v. HarrahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Midland Elevator Co. v. RobeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LowranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API