Legal Opinion

Latella v. Breyer Ice Cream Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1925No. Appeal 92PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The plaintiff’s auto was standing along tbe curb on the right side of the street at a place where the plaintiff had a right to have it. The defendant’s driver, having charge of a team of three horses, drove into the standing auto and caused the damage complained of. Neither the plaintiff, nor any of his witnesses, saw the accident. One of the witnesses, who was seated in the plaintiff’s business place, heard the crash andl upon investigating, saw one of the horses on top of the fender of the auto, land the driver also on top of the machine. The defendant urges that there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Fisher v. RuchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Silver Costume Co. v. PassantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Knox v. SimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Bender v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Maltz v. CarterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Young v. Yellow Cab Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Sutfin, Admr. v. BurtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API