Legal Opinion
Gibson-Michaels v. Bair
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 23, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2006-1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on two motions. The first is plaintiffs motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), seeking relief from an order granting the defendants’ motion dismiss as conceded and dismissing the action. The court denies the motion because it does not satisfy the requirements for relief under Rule 60(b). The second is a motion filed by plaintiffs retained counsel, seeking to withdraw as attorney. The court denies this motion because it does not comply with the requirements of Local Civil Rule 83.6.
Plaintiff failed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Robert Lepkowski v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Joseph P. Murray v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Lutsenko v. PshnkaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Moncier v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Green v. BLC Lexington SNF, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
- Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp. LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.