Legal Opinion

Wieber v. City of Everett

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1930No. 22113. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiffs, residents of the city of Everett, brought this action against that city to recover damages on account of personal injuries suffered by plaintiff Harry Wieber resulting from his having tripped and fallen on an alleged defective sidewalk, for the condition of which plaintiffs claim defendant is responsible. From a judgment entered in plaintiffs’ favor upon the verdict of a jury, defendant city appeals.

For convenience, plaintiff Harry Wieber will be referred to herein as though he were the sole party respondent.

Appellant did not move for a nonsuit at the close of respondent’s case,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grass v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Davison v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lee v. Gorman Packing CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Sauls v. SchepplerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Sauls v. SchepplerWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API