Legal Opinion

Puckett v. Oelze

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 12, 1985No. 5-84-0128PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE JONES

delivered the opinion of the court:

In this appeal we are asked by defendant-appellant Oelze to construe a farmout agreement of an oil and gas lease. Defendant contends here, as he did before the trial court, that State-mandated oil well spacing requirements create a latent ambiguity in the agreement that calls for evidence to show the true intention of the parties. The trial court found no such latent ambiguity and entered a final order for the plaintiffs. We affirm.

The plaintiffs are three brothers, R. E. Puckett, Thomas Puckett and Ferrell Puckett. Prior to October…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fox v. Inter-State Assurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. AZL Resources, Inc. v. BromagenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barbara W. Wikoff, Individually and as of the Estate of John W. Wikoff v. John Vanderveld, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. U S G Interiors, Inc. v. Commercial & Architectural Products, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc. v. AcevedoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. In Re Marriage of HildebrandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Lockett v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API