Legal Opinion

State v. Deisz

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2008No. 33434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Judge Pro Tern.

Daniel M. Deisz appeals from his judgment of conviction and sentences for aggravated battery and aggravated assault. Specifically, Deisz challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the district court’s reliance during sentencing on a victim impact statement. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Deisz’s wife requested a domestic protection order against Deisz and, on July 8, 2005, a magistrate issued a protection order, which contained an expiration date of July 21, 2005. 1 The order prohibited Deisz from going…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Woodrow John GrantIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. MorganNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. Robert Cassidy HansenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. Robert Cassidy HansenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API