Green River Manufacturing Co. v. Bell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
The question of law is this: Are the deeds, lease and option executed to the defendant void or voidable at the election of the company without reference to the adequacy of the consideration or the absence of fraud?
The plaintiff contends that the conveyances referred to, the lease and the option are void by reason of the fact that the deeds were executed in the name of the plaintiff by J. O. Bell, vice-president of the plaintiff company, to E. D. Bell, secretary of plaintiff company, and that by virtue of this fiduciary relationship the attempted conveyances are void.
The effect of conveyances…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McIver v. Young Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Pender v. . SpeightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Cleveland Cotton Mills v. Commissioners of Cleveland CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Bailey v. . HassellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Caldwell v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Underwood v. StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- LeCann v. Cobham (In re Cobham)District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Highland Cotton Mills v. Ragan Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Lavecchia v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Poore v. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.