Molter v. Department of Treasury
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
We must decide whether distributions from a deferred compensation plan, paid to a nonresident, are subject to the state’s income tax if the original contributions to the plan represented earnings from employment in Michigan. Affirming a decision of the Court of Claims, the Court of Appeals ruled that distributions from such a plan are taxable. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
Plaintiff Molter, while a State of Michigan employee, participated in a deferred compensation plan qualified under § 457 of the Internal Revenue Code (irc).1 He began receiving distributions from his plan account…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re Dodge BrothersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority v. Boards of Supervisors of Five CountiesMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Gosewisch v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Plymouth Township v. Wayne County Board of CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Grand Traverse County v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- Sharper Image Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Allen v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Ameritech Publishing, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.