Legal Opinion

Brintley v. Singletary

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 7, 1992No. 92-01769PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Freeman Brintley petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. He contends, and we agree, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in the direct appeal from his conviction and sentence for possession of firearm by convicted felon.1 Specifically, counsel neglected to contest the legality of Brintley’s ten-year prison sentence. We *1304now conclude that the sentence was erroneously imposed, requiring us to remand this case for resentencing.

The ten-year sentence represents a considerable departure from the range recommended under sentencing guidelines. However, we find no indication…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Ree v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  4. State v. BetancourtSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Winters v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gervasoni v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Doak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API