Legal Opinion

United States v. Tappenbeck

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1916No. 1646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7791 (T. D. 35797).

1Opinion of the Court

Baebee, Judge,

delivered the opinion of .the court:

The merchandise in this case is identical with that involved in United States v. McKesson & Robbins (7 Ct. Cust. Appls., 13; T. D. 36267), in which opinion is handed down concurrently herewith, the two cases having been heard together in this court. The importer presents neither brief nor oral argument here.

While the testimony of record varies a little from that in the companion case it is sufficient to support the same conclusion that the board reached in that case, and its opinion in each case is the same.

For the reasons stated in our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. McKessonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. McGibbonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Slazengers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. United States v. KitchenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API