Legal Opinion

ARNHOLD v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 15, 2025No. 19-1407Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1407 (Filed: September 15, 2025) ************************************* KANDI ARNHOLD, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * ************************************* Roger J. Marzulla, with whom was Nancie G. Marzulla, Marzulla Law, LLC, Washington, DC, counsel for Plaintiffs. Also with whom were Stephen E. Morrissey, Jordan Connors, Jenna G. Farleigh, and Tanner Laiche, Susman Godfrey LLP, Seattle, WA. Gregory M. Cumming, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, counsel for Defendant. OPINION…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API