Legal Opinion

Lawson v. Helmer

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2003No. S-10034PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Lee Lawson appeals the superior court's holding that his defamation claim against Ernie and Linda Helmer fails as a matter of law and the court's award of attorney's fees to the Helmers. We hold that the superior court correctly held that the Helmers' testimony and statements to a custody investigator are immunized from Lawson's derivative civil defamation suit. We affirm the superior court's dismissal of Lawson's claims and its award of attorney's fees to the Helmers.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

Lee Lawson has known Ernie and Linda Helmer for over…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Binder v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gail Bierman and Beth Weier v. Scott Weier and Author Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Smith v. StaffordAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Gilbert v. SperbeckAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API