Legal Opinion
CADLE COMPANY, INC. v. Wallach Concrete, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1995No. 22164PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Chief Justice.
Appellant The Cadle Company, Inc. (Cadle) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Appellee Wallach Concrete, Inc. (Wallach), concluding Cadle was not a holder in due course and therefore was subject to the defenses asserted by Wallach against collection on a promissory note. We address the following issues on appeal: (1) Whether the trial court erred in concluding Cadle did not qualify as a holder in due course of a promissory note and accompanying guaranty and (2) whether the trial court erred in determining the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Jack H. Harrison and Frederick G. RixeyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. John W. NewhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bank of New York v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
- Schettler v. RALRON CAPITAL CORPORATIONNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Bank of New York Mellon v. LopesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bank of New York Mellon v. LopesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bank of New York v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.