Legal Opinion
Hill v. Rabinowitch
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1920No. Docket No. 96PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Marschner (Adolph F.), J. Bill by Louis Hill and others against Samuel Rabinowitch to enjoin the violation of certain building restrictions. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
In the summer of 1911 James S. Holden, Daniel E. Murray, Dexter M. Ferry, Jr., and Jeannette Hawkins Ferry, his wife, executed a plat of a subdivision known as Holden & Murray’s subdivision, and caused the same to be recorded. The plat contained the following restrictions:
“The premises described in the within plat and subdivision are hereby subjected to the following restrictions, agreements and covenants which shall continue in force until January 1, 1937, and no longer, and that during that period shall be observed by the proprietors herein described and by their grantees and assigns and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Casterton v. PlotkinMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson Family Ltd. Partnership v. White Pine Wireless, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- De Galan v. BarakMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Kime v. DunitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Austin v. KirbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Nordwood Estates SubdivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939