Legal Opinion
Norton v. Hayes
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1847PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Beardsley, J.
The notice of retainer, given by Mr. Terry as attorney for Hayes, was not “ entering his appearance” in the cause, within the terms or the meaning of the act of congress. (1 Story’s Laws U. S. 57, § 12.) The appearance was first entered by Mr. Goddard on the 23d of December, at which time the petition for the removal of the cause, and a bond with sureties, as the act requires, were filed with the clerk. These being done at one and the same time, the application for the removal was made in due season. (Supra, § 12; Redmond v. Russell, 12 John. 153.)
This is not an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gordon v. LongestSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Redmond v. RussellNew York Supreme Court · 1815
- People ex rel. Kanouse v. Judges of New-York Common PleasNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Suydam v. SmithCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bennett v. BirdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Eddy v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1915
- Cooley v. LawrenceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
- Stevens v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Supreme Court · 1863
- Cooke v. State National Bank of BostonNew York Supreme Court · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.