Legal Opinion
De Bobula v. Goss
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 15, 1951No. 10788_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant at one time occupied an apartment as tenant of certain of the appellees. On the basis of a claim that those appellees required the property for their personal use, they got a judgment of eviction against him in the Municipal Court. The Municipal Court of Appeals affirmed. DeBobula v. Coppedge, 40 A.2d 255.
Appellant afterwards filed in the District Court the present suit against the appellees. His complaint does not appear to assert the claim we are about to discuss. 1 But the parties agreed at pretrial and trial to proceed on the theory that appellant’s only…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Adriaanse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Ewald v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Simpkins v. BrooksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- De Bobula v. CoppedgeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- O'NEIL v. BerganDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Connelly v. BalkwillDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.