Legal Opinion

Lustine v. State Roads Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 20, 1960No. [No. 124, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

This is the second appeal by the property owners in a condemnation case wherein the State Roads Commission (Commission) is taking property for a controlled access arterial highway in Prince George’s County. The facts are accurately and adequately stated in the first appeal, Lustine v. State Roads Comm., 217 Md. 274, 142 A. 2d 566; so, we shall proceed immediately to a determination of the assignments of error presented by the appellants.

I

The appellants first contend that a motion to dismiss the petition for condemnation made by them should have been granted; because the original petition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ager v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  2. Hance v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank & Trust Co. v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Lustine v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  5. Langley Shopping Center, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tretick v. LaymanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Kloetzli v. KalmbacherCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Bayless v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API