Legal Opinion

Domanski v. Woda

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1937No. 26060PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

One of the causes for granting a new trial is enumerated in Section 11576, General Code of Ohio, as follows:

“7. Newly discovered evidence, material for the party applying, which with reasonable diligence he could not have discovered and produced at the trial.”

Turning to the record in the instant case we find that after appellant had testified fully as to his injury, ap pellees offered as' their witness Dr. Robert F. Thaw, an eye specialist of Akron, to testify on the same subject. He had examined and treated appellant’s eye shortly after the first accident, and saw him thereafter once or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheen v. KubiacOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. CompianoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Taylor v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thompson v. HayslipOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. SheppardOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  5. Hardendorf v. GafnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API