Floyd v. C.I.T. Corporation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
Plaintiff brought his action by the service of a complaint which alleged a single cause of action demanding damages in the sum of $3,000.00 on account of the facts, or the incident, set out in the complaint. Defendant moved that plaintiff be required to make his complaint more definite and certain by separating the three causes of action which appellant alleged were jumbled in the complaint. The motion was granted and in due time the amended complaint was served, in which were stated to be three causes of action. Thereupon, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Birmingham Southern Railway Co. v. LintnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Pomeroy v. PrescottSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
- Matheson v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Threatt v. Brewer Mining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wood Et Ux v. Baker Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Edgar v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Glenn v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967