Legal Opinion

Galbraith v. Drought

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. Ejectment, brought by Drought against Galbraith, to recover lot No. 20, in block No. 132, in the city of Wyandotte. Second trial at the April Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant brings the case to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

The facts in this case are these: The taxes upon a lot in Wyandotte being delinquent, proceedings were commenced in the district court, under the law of 1877, to foreclose the liens therefor. Upon such proceedings, the prop- ’ erty was sold at sheriff’s sale, and deeded to defendant in error, plaintiff below. This was his title. Plaintiff in error, defendant below, held by quitclaim from the parties who were owners at the time of the tax proceedings. The case, therefore, one in ejectment, hinges on the validity of the deed of defendant in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Spicer v. RowlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Needham v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. State Ex Rel. Wildlife Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. United States v. A Lot of Silk Goods & Other MerchandiseDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API