Legal Opinion

United States v. A Lot of Silk Goods & Other Merchandise

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided December 24, 1912Published

In Rem: On information for forfeiture. Motion to allow marshal’s bill of fees and expenses of sale.

1Opinion of the Court

Clemons, J.:

The marshal submits for approval his account of fees and expenses in the matter of the sale conducted by him under the decree of forfeiture herein.

[1] In this account are included the cost of advertising-notice of sale and the following other items:

“Service notice of sale [upon] ‘Pacific Commercial

Advertiser’; ‘Hawaii Shinpo Sha’; ‘Nippu Jiji’ and ‘Hawaiian-Japanese Daily Chronicle’ — -4

services @ $2.00 each .$8.00

“Serving decree [upon auctioneer] . 2.00
*138“Marshal's commission for collecting $1751.50; 5% on first $500.00 and on $1251.50 . 56.28
“City Auction Co. paid 5% commission…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The John E. MulfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
  2. Galbraith v. DroughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Wallis v. ShellyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
  4. United States v. FitzsimmonsU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API