Legal Opinion

Baker v. Kloster

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1894No. 5535PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the district court of Dakota county. Tried below before Norris, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

The petition in error must be dismissed, for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is not before us. The transcript filed in this court consists alone of the petition,. answer, instructions to the jury, and motion for a new trial. No journal entries are in the record, nor does *891it appear that a verdict has ever been returned by the jury, or that the motion for a new trial has been passed upon, or that a final judgment has been entered in the case. It is only a judgment, or final order, rendered by the district court that can be reviewed by the supreme court, and unless the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Garneau v. Omaha Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Seven Valleys Bank v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Einspahr v. Exchange National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Jandt v. DeranlieuNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API