Legal Opinion

Metered Appliances, Inc. v. 75 Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant’s predecessor entered into a lease in 1989 with the third-party defendant, a corporation previously dissolved by the Secretary of State pursuant to Tax Law § 203-a for failure to pay franchise tax. While a corporate dissolution may not affect the corporation’s right to carry on business for the purpose of winding up its affairs (see, Bowditch v 57 Laight St. Corp., 111 Misc 2d 255), new business is prohibited absent reinstatement by payment of back taxes (see, Lorisa Capital Corp. v Gallo, 119 AD2d 99, 110). As plaintiff did not seek reinstatement, the IAS Court properly held that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lorisa Capital Corp. v. GalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Bowditch v. 57 Laight Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau JengAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Judarl, L. L. C. v. Cycletech, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. AGV Productions, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. Olympus America, Inc. v. 5th Avenue Photo Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
  4. Cloister E., Inc. v. New York State Liq. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API