Legal Opinion
Burnside v. Sanders Associates, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 11, 1980No. Civ. A. CA-3-78-1298-DPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT M. HILL, District Judge.
Came on for consideration the motion of defendant Harris Data Communications, Inc., (“HDC”) to dismiss this suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court has considered the motion, the testimony and evidence adduced at two hearings on the motion, the discovery on file, and the briefs and arguments of counsel and is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.
I. Background
On September 12, 1979, plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint and Jury Demand. This complaint added HDC as a party defendant, alleging it to be “a corporation…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Quaker State Dyeing & Finishing Co., Inc. v. Itt Terryphone CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Candida Merino De Walker v. Pueblo International, Inc., and Third-Party v. Angel Negron, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Village Fair Shopping Center Co. v. Sam Broadhead TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- J.A. Olson Company v. City of Winona, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Danjaq, S.A. v. Pathe Communications Corporation Mgm-Pathe Communications Co. Tracinda Corporation Kirk Kerkorian Mgm/ua Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Robert J. Fritz v. American Home Shield CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Amarillo Oil Co. v. Mapco, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
- Beightol v. Capitol Bankers Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.