State v. Rouillard
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSherburne, J.
This is a prosecution under the provisions of P. L. 8608, -which reads in part as follows: “A person who wilfully administers or advises or causes to be administered anything to a woman pregnant or supposed by such person to be pregnant, or employs or causes to be employed any means with intent to procure the miscarriage of such woman * * # unless the same is necessary to preserve her life, shall” be punished in a certain manner. The respondent was arraigned and partly tried upon an information filed by the state’s attorney, charging that the respondent “did * * * employ or cause to be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ProutySupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- State v. RyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- State v. VillaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WoodmanseeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- State v. GosselinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- State v. Tex PageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
- State v. HarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937