Legal Opinion

Whipple v. C R Bard Incorporated

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided March 30, 2024No. 2:19-cv-01883Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 TOBIE RACYHELLE WHIPPLE, Case No. 19-cv-01883-RFB-BNW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 C.R. BARD, INC., and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC., 11 Defendants. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 101. For 15 the following reasons, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. 16 17 II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 18 A Master Complaint for Damages for Individual Claims was filed in the case of In Re Bard 19 IVC Filters Product Liability Litigation, 2:15-md-02641, in the United…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Barmettler v. Reno Air, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API