Legal Opinion
Kimbrell & Hamann, PA v. Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, Ltd.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 9, 1991No. 90-2169, 90-2170PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
578 So.2d 368 (1991)
KIMBRELL & HAMANN, P.A., Appellant,
v.
POPHAM, HAIK, SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN, LTD., Frank A. Shepherd, R. Benjamine Reid, Patricia H. Thompson, Stuart J. McGregor, Robert E. Dady, Bruce C. King, Paul T. Reid, and Douglas Chumbley, Appellees.
Nos. 90-2169, 90-2170.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 9, 1991.
Kelly, Black, Black, Byrne, Beasley & Bales, P.A., Daniels & Talisman, P.A., and Patrice A. Talisman, Miami, for appellant.
Kenny Nachwalter Seymour & Arnold, P.A., and Michael Nachwalter and Scott E. Perwin, Miami, for appellees.
Before NESBITT, BASKIN and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Beaver Coaches, Inc. v. REVELS NAT. RV SALES, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Sabates v. International Med. Centers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Eugene W. Kelsey v. ARCHIT. OPENINGSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Pacemaker Corp. v. EusterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ALL AM. SEMICONDUCTOR v. Unisys Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Lee v. All Florida Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Weiss v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991