American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Stettenheim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
The facts agreed to in this submission are succinctly and correctly stated in the plaintiff’s brief as follows: The defendant was employed under a written agreement as an- insurance agent to procure insurance and manage insurance matters in connection with marine insurance, employers’ liability insurance, employees’ pensions and workmen’s collective benefits at plants owned by the American Smelters Securities Company and the plaintiff American Smelting and Refining Company. He was to receive a salary of $3,000 per year, but agreed to apply thereon all commissions earned on insurance…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Kruger v. Page Management Co.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- In re the Estate of ClonanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
- I. Tanenbaum, Son & Co. v. Rothenberg & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Conklin v. JablonskiNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- In re the Accounting of SchlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.