Legal Opinion

Scarbrough & Davis v. Culp

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1925No. 6870PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

October 19, 1922, appellants Scarbrough & Davis, by a written contract with Coleman county, agreed to construct a graveled road in that county.

November 2, 1922, they executed their bond to said county, conditioned and in the form required by articles 6394f to 6394j, Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914, relating to the securing of laborers for labor done and ma-terialmen for material furnished in and about the construction of said road.

November 6,1922, they entered into a written contract with one G-. A. Eproson for him to do and perform, as subcontractor, their said contract with Coleman…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Max Lindheim & Bro. v. MuschampTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cohen v. MunsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Russell v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Wrenn v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McKinney v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Southwestern Peanut Growers Ass'n v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Employers' Casualty Co. v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Stribling v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Hamlin v. &198tna Cas. SuretyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API