Legal Opinion

Hamlin v. &198tna Cas. Surety

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1928No. 3043. [fn*]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellants, J. M. Hamlin et al., instituted this suit in the district court of Parmer county, Tex., against the appellee, Ætna Casualty Surety Company, to recover on a bond guaranteeing the performance of a building contract made by appellants with the Bowman Construction Company.

The appellants allege that the Bowman Construction Company is a copartnership, composed of E. A. Bowman and W. S. Carson, both of whom are beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and that the partnership and both members thereof are notoriously insolvent, and hence are not made parties to this suit.

Appellants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phillio v. BlytheTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Max Lindheim & Bro. v. MuschampTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Cohen v. MunsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Greenville Gas & Fuel Co. v. Commercial Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Graves v. McCollum LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Panhandle Steel Erectors, Inc. v. WhitlowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Smith v. First Nat. Bank in GrovetonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Storrs-Schaefer Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Austin v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Leftwich v. MillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API