Legal Opinion
Quisenberry v. Compass Vision, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 14, 2007No. 07CV1135 BEN (AJB)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
ROGER T. BENITEZ, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff EVA QUISENBERRY (“Plaintiff’) originally filed this lawsuit in a California state court. Defendants COMPASS VISION, INC. and QUEST DIAGNOSTICS, INC. (“Defendants”) timely removed this action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleged the following claims: negligence, fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff also asked for punitive and compensatory damages.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Berry v. National Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Landon v. Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Laboratory Corp. of America HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Shaw v. Psychemedics CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Fujisawa v. Compass Vision, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.