Legal Opinion
Marcotte v. General Electric Capital Services, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 20, 2010No. Case 08cv1766 BTM (WMc)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Defendant GE Money Bank, FSB (“GEMB”) has filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 54]. Plaintiff has also filed an Ex-Parte Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [Doc. 60]. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and DENIES as moot Plaintiffs Ex-Parte Motion..
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff allegedly owes Defendants 2 a consumer debt. In early 2008, Plaintiff retained the Doan Law Firm to help him resolve his debts and file for bankruptcy. The Doan…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelliher v. Target National BankDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- David Velador v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- McGhee v. Buffalo & Associates, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2013