Legal Opinion

Schofield v. Material Transit, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 21, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

206 A.2d 100 (1960)

Alfred W. SCHOFIELD, Ellen G. Schofield, Frank Dilworth, Mary E. Dilworth, Walter F. Read, May Read, and Thomas Nesci, an infant by his next friend, Marie C. Nesci, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

v.

MATERIAL TRANSIT, INC., a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant.

Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.

September 21, 1960.[*]

J. Donald Craven and Robert H. Huber, Wilmington, for plaintiffs.

E. D. Griffenberg, Jr., of Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington, for defendant.

MARVEL, Vice Chancellor.

By stipulation approved by the Court on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Harlan & Hollingsworth Co. v. PaschallCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1882
  3. Moss v. KuhwaldCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  4. Schofield v. Material Transit, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White Lake Improvement Ass'n v. City of WhitehallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Webb v. Diamond State Telephone CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API