Legal Opinion
William T. Broderick v. Francis Roache, Arthur Morgan, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 18, 1993No. 92-2389PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, defendant-appellant Arthur Morgan, Jr. (“Morgan”) challenges the district court’s ruling that he was not entitled to qualified immunity. Finding no error in the district court’s ruling, we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
On May 12, 1990, plaintiffs-appelleés the Boston Police Superior Officers Federation (“Federation”) and William Broderick (“Bro-derick”), an employee of the Boston Police Department (“Department”) 1 and an official of the Federation, 2 initiated this action against Morgan, the Department’s Deputy Superintendent in charge of the Internal Affairs Division…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Grant v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Howcroft v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Brent K. Hansen v. John Soldenwagner Raymond Malecki John Puleo, City of SunriseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Thomas WELSH, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Edward J. DERWINSKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Rivera-Jimenez v. PierluisiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.