Legal Opinion

Horad v. Yee

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1951No. 1069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a refusal of the trial court to grant him á judgment of recovery against a garnishee. His suit was originally filed on November 28, 1950 against Kinch Fennell on a promissory note. On January 6, 1951 judgment by default was entered on the claim for $746.96 with interest and costs and an attorney’s fee of $75. On February 12, plaintiff caused a writ of • garnishment to be issued against Billy Yee, who is appellee here. The writ was accompanied, by the'usual interrogatories to be answered'in ten-days as to credits of defendant in the garnishee’s hands.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ballou v. KempCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. Ray v. BruceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. James E. Colliflower & Co. v. McCallum-Sauber Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ascher v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  2. Wrecking Corp. of America, Virginia, Inc. v. Jersey Welding Supply, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API