Bailey v. Sibley Quarry Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Assumpsit by James Bailey against the Sibley Quarry Company, a corporation, for money had and received. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.
This is an action of assumpsit in which plaintiff seeks to recover certain moneys which he had earned as postmaster at Sibley, Mich. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s proofs, the trial court was of the opinion that plaintiff had not made out a case, and therefore directed a *322verdict for defendant. Plaintiff brings the case to this court by writ of error.
The defendant operates a stone quarry at Sibley. The population of the village is made up almost wholly of the employés of defendant and their families. The defendant opened a store at Sibley on January 1, 1903, for the sale of general…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co. v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Anderson v. BranstromMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Clark v. Irondequoit Coal & Supply Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Francis v. JoslynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935