Legal Opinion

Deal v. Dimondo

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 21, 2016No. N16C-03-005 JAPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEBORAH A. DEAL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N16C-03-005 JAP ) LAUREN E. DIMONDO and ) USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The issue before the court is a narrow one: Which version of the underinsured motorist statute applies to this case? Under the former version Plaintiff is not entitled to UIM benefits; under the more recent version, she is. Plaintiff’s insurance carrier, USAA, has moved to dismiss claiming that the older version of the statute applies here. The court agrees. The facts are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leatherbury v. GreenspunSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. Friends of the H. Fletcher Brown Mansion v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Tatum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API