Jackson v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The petitioner (whom we shall call the defendant), sought relief from a single justice of this court under G. L. c. 211, § 3, from the denial of his motion to dismiss in the Superior Court. Because the motion was based on double jeopardy grounds, the single justice ruled that the matter was properly before him pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, but denied the petition on the merits. This court determined that the requirements of SJ.C. Rule 2:21 (2), 421 Mass. 1303 (1995), had been *261met and permitted the defendant to pursue this interlocutory appeal from the judgment of the single justice.
1. Facts…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jackson v. CoalterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District Commonwealth v. RoberioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Jackson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. PimentalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Burton v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.