Legal Opinion

Housley v. Laster

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice G-been

The question presented upon this appeal is whether nephews and nieces of an intestate share the estate per capita or per stirpes, the brothers and sisters of the intestate all being dead. The probate judge held that the estate was to be distributed per stirpes and those adversely affected have appealed to this court.

We are of opinion that the probate judge decided the question properly. Section 8389 of the Code of 1932 regulates the distribution of the surplus personalty of an intestate. Subsection 5 of that statute provides:

“If no father or mother, to brothers and sisters, or the children of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Freed v. BerkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. In Re Reil's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Carter v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  4. Johnson v. HuntleyWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. In re the Estate of DavolDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API