Legal Opinion

Magoon v. O'Connor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Non. Matt. O. Reynolds, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

This action was instituted before a j ustice of the peace on tbe following account:

“Wm. O’Connor

In account with Wm. E. Magoon, Dr. 1903.

To work done on Fort Smith & West-.. ern Ry.$1,600.70

6% Int. from Mar. ’06 to date,.68.00

$1,668.70

*131 Credits.

1903.

By Oct. ac. $645.77

” Nov. ” . . 201.00

” .Cash ” . . 100,00

” Credit.. . 223.15

$1,169.92

$1,169.92

“Balance Une, .$ 498.78

The case proceeded' to the circuit court where leave was obtained to file an amended account or statement, which was as follows:

“Wm. O’Connor,
“In account with William E. Magoon, Debtor. 1902-3.

To work done on the Fort Smith and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Butts v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Brashears v. StrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Sidway v. Missouri Land & Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Peddicord v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Rechnitzer v. VogelsangMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hale v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Mansur v. LinneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API