Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1973No. H-105Published

1Opinion of the Court

September 17, 1973 The Honorable Hugh C. Yantis, Jr. Opinion No. H- 105 Executive Director Texas Water Quality Board Re: What is the meaning P. 0. Box 13246, Capitol Station of the term “total Austin, Texas 78711 continuous service” as used in House Bill 139, General Appro- priations Act, 63rd, Dear Mr. Yantis: Legislature? The General Appropriation Bill for the 1974-1975 fiscal years (House Bill No. 139, 63rd Legislature) contains, as §a(l) of Article V “Salary Rates for Classified Positions, I’the following provision: “An employee who is c,lassified in Salary Groups 2 through 7 inclusive on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bickler v. BicklerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Commissioners Court of Lubbock County v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. United States v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Boone v. City of StephenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Kennedy v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API