Bomarko, Inc. v. Rapistan Corp.

Following a final judgment, defendant filed this appeal as of right from the trial court orders that granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary disposition with regard to their breach of contract claim and denied defendant’s motion for reconsideration.1 We affirm.

Plaintiffs, James D. Azzar and his assignee, Bomarko, Inc., claimed breach of contract because of Rapistan Corporation’s failure to pay the 1990 summer and winter taxes on certain real property in Grand Rapids sold by Rapistan to plaintiffs. All the parties filed motions for summary disposition with regard to the meaning of the…