Legal Opinion
Rice v. Floyd
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1989No. 88-SC-477-DGPublished
1Opinion of the Court
768 S.W.2d 57 (1989)
Peggy A. RICE, Appellant,
v.
Mayme B. FLOYD, William A. Floyd and Guy Duerson, Jr., Attorney-in-Fact for Mayme B. Floyd, Appellees.
No. 88-SC-477-DG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
April 6, 1989.
Glenn E. Acree, McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, Lexington, Charles R. Coy, Coy, Coy & Gilbert, Richmond, for appellant.
James Dean Liebman, Liebman & Liebman, Frankfort, Guy K. Duerson, Duerson & Duerson, Berea, Robert C. Moody, Richmond, for appellees.
WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.
This appeal involves a Petition pursuant to K.R.S. 387.500 which was dismissed by the district court on the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Leibson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Leibson.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
- Rice v. FloydKentucky Supreme Court · 1989
- Downing v. SiddensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- In re the Estate of WilhelmNew York Surrogate's Court · 1987
- Metcalf v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946