Legal Opinion

Walker v. Spiller

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1999No. Civ.A. 95-6921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.

Before me is a motion for summary judgment by defendant Detective Thomas J. Spiller. Having accepted plaintiffs version of the contested facts as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, I will grant defendant’s motion. I conclude that, as a matter of law, Detective Spiller had probable cause to arrest Walker and was not required to investigate Walker’s alibi yrhen he allegedly became aware of it. I will grant judgment in favor of defendant on all claims, with the single exception of plaintiffs claim that Spiller used excessive force…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swope v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Vazquez v. RossnagleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. DIXON v. SCHWEIZERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API