Walker v. Spiller
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Before me is a motion for summary judgment by defendant Detective Thomas J. Spiller. Having accepted plaintiffs version of the contested facts as true, and drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, I will grant defendant’s motion. I conclude that, as a matter of law, Detective Spiller had probable cause to arrest Walker and was not required to investigate Walker’s alibi yrhen he allegedly became aware of it. I will grant judgment in favor of defendant on all claims, with the single exception of plaintiffs claim that Spiller used excessive force…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Swope v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Vazquez v. RossnagleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- DIXON v. SCHWEIZERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020