Legal Opinion
Highland Ditch Co. v. Union Reservoir Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 15, 1912No. 6857PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Appeal from Boulder District Court. — Hon. James E. Garrigues, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert
The Union Reservoir Company instituted proceedings for the adjudication of rights to the use of water for irrigation and storage in Water District No. 5. A referee was appointed, who heard the evidence, which was reduced to writing and reported to the court, • together with findings of fact based thereon, and a proposed decree. -The report and proposed decree were confirmed. From this decree The Plighland Ditch Company appeals, in so far as it adjudicates its priorities and those of The Union Reservoir Company.
The Ditch Company owns the McIntosh reservoir, which is a part of its irrigation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sieber v. FrinkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
- Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Fort Morgan Land & Canal Co. v. South Platte Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Woods v. SargentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Denver, South Park & Pacific R. R. v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lawrence v. SouthardWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Cline v. WhittenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Amity Mutual Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Pioneer Irr. Co. v. Board of Comr'sDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1916
- Sussex Real Estate Corp. v. SbroccaColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.