Legal Opinion

State v. Diehl

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Harrison County

Decided September 11, 2017No. 17 HA 0001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGES: Hon. Carol Ann Robb, Hon. Gene Donofrio, Hon. Cheryl L. Waite

OPINION

ROBB, P.J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Anthony Diehl appeals from his plea entered in Harrison County Common Pleas Court for rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1) and (B). Appellant raises three assignments of error in this appeal. All three assignments of error concern the type of plea he entered. During Appellant's plea colloquy, his plea was called an " Alford plea," a "no contest plea," and an " Alford plea of no contest." In the sentencing judgment entry the trial court called the plea, "a plea of 'No Contest' to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API